Home / Insights / Finance

DSCR and Debt Capacity: How Credit Committees Read Cash

Debt capacity depends far less on the size of the assets on the balance sheet than on whether the debt can be paid from the cash generated over its life. DSCR is one of the basic measures of that relationship.

How much debt a company can carry is not determined by total assets or turnover alone. The real question is whether principal and interest payments can be met from the cash generated by operations. The Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) turns that relationship into a simple measure.

A worked example

If a business has €3,0 million of annual cash flow available for debt service and principal plus interest payments of €2,0 million in the same period, the DSCR is 1,50x. That means €1,50 of cash is generated for every €1 of debt service. But one ratio is not enough on its own: the minimum DSCR, the average DSCR and the stress scenario have to be seen together.

The questions the credit committee asks

• What assumptions is the cash flow based on, and are they consistent with past performance?
• How much of the revenue comes from a single customer, a single country or a single product?
• How far does DSCR fall under an interest rate, currency, energy cost or raw material shock?
• Have maintenance capex and the working capital requirement been properly deducted from the cash flow?
• Is the loan tenor consistent with the economic life of the asset and its cash generation profile?

Why are EBITDA and DSCR not the same thing?

EBITDA is a useful measure of operating performance, but it is not cash. Tax, the increase in working capital, maintenance capex and other cash outflows can materially change what is left for debt service. A bridge from EBITDA to cash therefore has to be built into any debt capacity calculation.

Sound ways to increase debt capacity

More collateral does not always mean more debt capacity. Strengthening cash generation, correcting the maturity structure, phasing capital expenditure, cutting working capital days and designing an appropriate amortisation profile are more durable answers.

In a credit discussion, the strong file is not the one that says “we need this much credit” but the one that shows from which cash flow, at what level of stress and with what buffer the debt will be repaid.

Official sources and further reading

• EBA — Guidelines on loan origination and monitoring

The four most common errors in calculating DSCR

• Treating EBITDA directly as cash available for debt service
• Leaving out the increase in working capital and maintenance CAPEX
• Looking only at the annual average and missing the seasonal liquidity gap
• Calculating the post-drawdown interest and principal profile on the old debt schedule

Solving debt capacity in reverse

DSCR can be used not only to test existing debt but to answer “how much debt can the company carry?” First determine the sustainable cash available for debt service; then calculate the maximum annual debt service consistent with the target safety buffer; then derive an approximate principal amount from the interest rate, tenor and amortisation structure. This approach starts the credit request from repayment capacity rather than from what the company wants.

A sales shock alone is not enough in a stress test

In many companies a fall in sales comes with a deterioration in margin, collections and inventory at the same time. The downside scenario should therefore contain economically coherent combinations rather than isolated single-variable shocks. A 10% fall in sales plus 2 points of gross margin plus 15 days of additional collection time, for example, shows the cash effect far more realistically.

DSCR and covenants are not the same thing

The covenant definition in the loan agreement may differ from management's economic definition of DSCR. Net Debt/EBITDA, interest coverage or specific calculation adjustments may be defined separately in the contract. The financial model should show economic repayment capacity and contractual covenant headroom separately.

Example: same EBITDA, different DSCR

Suppose two companies each have annual EBITDA of TRY 10 million. In company A, working capital absorbs TRY 1 million of cash, maintenance CAPEX is TRY 1 million and annual debt service is TRY 5 million. In company B, working capital absorbs TRY 4 million of cash, maintenance CAPEX is TRY 2 million and debt service is again TRY 5 million. Even with identical EBITDA, company B has far less cash available for debt service. The example shows why EBITDA alone is not enough in credit analysis.

Why is the DSCR trend more valuable than a single period ratio?

If a company produces a DSCR of 1,45 in 2026 but falls to 1,10 in 2027 and to 0,95 by 2028 then the strong ratio of the first year can mislead. A balloon repayment, a rising principal profile after an investment, the end of a fixed rate period or the currency effect on foreign currency debt can all damage the ratio later. Both the profile over the life of the loan and the lowest ratio should be watched together.

A debt capacity decision tree

1. Is the operating model sustainable? If not, restructuring the debt is not a solution on its own.
2. How much cash generation is sustainable? Separate one-off income and exceptional items.
3. What is the minimum acceptable buffer? Set the target DSCR according to sector volatility.
4. What is the maximum debt service consistent with that buffer?
5. If existing debt service is high, at what level should the tenor, the principal profile or the debt amount change?

A reporting set for the CFO

• Annual and quarterly DSCR under the existing and the new structure
• A cross-check against Net Debt/EBITDA and Interest Coverage
• The weakest period and covenant headroom
• Minimum DSCR under the stress scenarios
• Sensitivity to an extension of tenor or a change in interest rates